Marking 20 years
of bold journalism,
reader supported.
Analysis
Science + Tech
Environment

Will Elon Musk Drop Space Junk on Your Head?

SpaceX debris crashed onto Saskatchewan farmland, highlighting increasing risks.

Aaron Boley and Samantha Lawler 31 Jul 2024The Conversation

Aaron Boley is an associate professor of physics and astronomy at the University of British Columbia. Samantha Lawler is an associate professor of astronomy at the University of Regina. This article was originally published by the Conversation.

In late April, farmers in Saskatchewan stumbled upon spacecraft fragments while preparing their fields for seeding. It sounds like the beginning of a science fiction movie, but this really happened, sending a powerful warning: it is only a matter of time before someone is seriously hurt or killed by falling space junk.

The Axiom Space private astronaut mission Ax-3 concluded safely on Feb. 9 when its SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule splashed down off the coast of Florida. Several weeks later, the Crew Dragon’s cargo trunk re-entered the atmosphere over Canada after being abandoned in orbit prior to the capsule’s return.

Several incidents already

The Federal Aviation Administration, charged with approving commercial space-flight launches in the United States, has claimed that such trunks typically “burn up” during their re-entry.

This is clearly incorrect. Similar fragments, likely from the trunk of a different Crew Dragon mission, were found in North Carolina in May, including a smaller piece that landed on the roof of a house.

Trunk fragments were even found from Elon Musk’s first operational crewed Dragon mission, with those pieces strewn over fields in New South Wales, Australia. It is becoming evident that deadly debris falls to the ground every time a Crew Dragon trunk re-enters, with pieces being found whenever this occurs over an accessible area.

Four large pieces of black space junk lie on a concrete floor, some leaning against the wall. The largest are at least two metres tall.
Space junk recovered from a farm in Saskatchewan in April. Photo by S. Lawler, Creative Commons licensed.

These are not small pieces, with some approaching the size of ping-pong tables and weighing 100 pounds. They could easily cause a fatality or substantial damage.

Crew Dragon trunks are only one part of a much larger problem.

So far, we’ve been lucky

Private or governmental, American or Chinese, organizations involved with space launches regularly allow objects like rocket bodies and satellites to re-enter uncontrollably, under the false premise that they will either burn up or fall into the ocean.

Indeed, NASA allowed an old battery pallet to be released from the International Space Station, knowing it would re-enter uncontrollably. NASA said it should burn up completely, which was proven wrong in March when a potentially lethal fragment crashed through the roof, then ceiling and then floor of a house in Florida.

So far, no one is known to have been hurt by falling space junk, but that’s just a matter of luck; people are finding more and more pieces in or near inhabited areas worldwide.

Whose responsibility?

The 1972 Liability Convention makes countries absolutely liable for damage, including loss of life, caused by their space objects falling onto the surface of the Earth or striking airplanes in flight. And the 1967 Outer Space Treaty makes countries responsible for all their space actors, including private companies.

Yet the Liability Convention is an agreement between countries, which makes the interactions between private citizens, like Saskatchewan farmers, and powerful space companies, like SpaceX, less straightforward. In the absence of governmental action, individuals may need to resort to lawsuits.

As for the Crew Dragon trunk scattered across Saskatchewan, in June SpaceX sent two employees in a rented U-Haul truck to pick up the pieces, reportedly paying farmers for the fragments. Had there been a death, or damage to million-dollar farm equipment, the outcome would have been much more complicated.

What goes up must come down

Uncontrolled re-entries are relics of early space flight. But with rocket launches occurring almost daily — fuelled in part by space tourism, mega-constellations and large low-Earth-orbit satellites — these uncontrolled re-entries cannot continue. Estimates already place the yearly chance of a casualty at few per cent, and it will get worse.

A clear alternative is to use controlled re-entries through a combination of mission planning, restrictions on the number of re-entries and reignitable engines; these technologies and practices already exist, albeit at extra costs.

For objects that cannot be controlled, they will need to be designed to burn up in the atmosphere entirely. But this practice is already affecting upper atmosphere chemistry, with potential implications for climate and ozone depletion.

And when corporations or governmental organizations exceed pollution and safety thresholds for re-entry, licences should be suspended or revoked until the issue is addressed.

Immediate action needed

There is no doubt that satellites and space technologies bring tremendous benefits to society. But the promise of prosperity is not an excuse for reckless behaviour.

Regulating agencies need to stop ignoring close calls — like the SpaceX debris that fell on Saskatchewan — and take action, before disaster strikes.The Conversation  [Tyee]

  • Share:

Get The Tyee's Daily Catch, our free daily newsletter.

Tyee Commenting Guidelines

Comments that violate guidelines risk being deleted, and violations may result in a temporary or permanent user ban. Maintain the spirit of good conversation to stay in the discussion and be patient with moderators. Comments are reviewed regularly but not in real time.

Do:

  • Be thoughtful about how your words may affect the communities you are addressing. Language matters
  • Keep comments under 250 words
  • Challenge arguments, not commenters
  • Flag trolls and guideline violations
  • Treat all with respect and curiosity, learn from differences of opinion
  • Verify facts, debunk rumours, point out logical fallacies
  • Add context and background
  • Note typos and reporting blind spots
  • Stay on topic

Do not:

  • Use sexist, classist, racist, homophobic or transphobic language
  • Ridicule, misgender, bully, threaten, name call, troll or wish harm on others or justify violence
  • Personally attack authors, contributors or members of the general public
  • Spread misinformation or perpetuate conspiracies
  • Libel, defame or publish falsehoods
  • Attempt to guess other commenters’ real-life identities
  • Post links without providing context

Most Popular

Most Commented

Most Emailed

LATEST STORIES

The Barometer

What’s Your Favourite Local Critter?

Take this week's poll